What Are Kolb’s Learning Styles?

Ever wonder why some people learn best by engaging in hands-on activities while others prefer to sit back and observe before jumping in? Kolb’s learning styles theory suggests that everyone has a preferred way of learning, and understanding your own style can dramatically enhance your educational and professional experiences.

While the concept of learning styles is popular, it is important to note that research has found that these purported learning styles do not appear to have an impact on learning outcomes. In fact, much of the research indicates that learning in a variety of ways is the most effective approach. Learning more about these styles can give you some context and help you think about the ways that you might enjoy learning the most.

In this article, we’ll discuss Kolb’s four distinct learning styles—diverging, Assimilating, Converging, and Accommodating—and explore how you can identify and leverage your personal style for more effective learning. We’ll also offer practical tips for applying this theory in various settings, from classrooms to the workplace, ensuring you get the most out of every learning opportunity.

Key Takeaways

• Kolb’s learning styles include Diverging, Assimilating, Converging, and Accommodating.
• Diverging learners excel in creative fields and prefer observing before deciding.
• Assimilating learners thrive on logical analysis and structured explanations.
• Converging learners enjoy problem-solving and applying ideas practically.
• Accommodating learners excel in hands-on experiences and adaptive learning.

Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle

Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle is a dynamic four-stage process that explains how individuals learn through experience.

First, you start with a Concrete Experience. This is where you have a new experience or try something familiar in a new way. Imagine touching a hot stove and feeling the burn—that’s your concrete experience.

Next, you move to Reflective Observation. Here, you think about what happened during the experience. You might ask yourself questions like, ‘Why did that happen?’ or ‘What could I’ve done differently?’ This reflection helps you understand the event better.

The third stage is Abstract Conceptualization. In this phase, you form new ideas or tweak existing ones based on your reflections. You might come up with a theory about why touching the stove caused a burn or consider new ways to avoid getting hurt in the future.

In the final stage, you begin with Active Experimentation. This is where you actually put all those ideas and experiences to the test. You apply what you’ve learned to new situations and think of different ways that you might deal with a problem. This stage is helpful for confirming what you know and refining your skills.

Diverging Learning Style

Moving from the broad stages of Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle, let’s now focus on the Diverging learning style, which combines feeling and watching to gather diverse perspectives. If you identify with this style, you prefer to observe situations and listen to others before making decisions. You enjoy brainstorming and generating many ideas, which makes you good at seeing things from different angles.

People with a Diverging learning style are often sensitive and imaginative. You might find yourself excelling in creative fields like art, music, or writing. Your strength lies in your ability to notice details that others might miss, and you can easily empathize with other people’s feelings and viewpoints.

In group settings, you work well with others, contributing by offering creative solutions and encouraging open discussions. You thrive in environments where you can gather a variety of information and consider multiple perspectives before reaching conclusions.

To enhance your learning, engage in activities that allow for reflection and observation, such as group discussions, role-playing, and interactive workshops. By understanding your Diverging learning style, you can better tailor your learning experiences to match your strengths and preferences.

Assimilating Learning Style

If you identify with the Assimilating learning style, you thrive on logical analysis and abstract concepts. You prefer to digest information through structured, clear explanations rather than diving into hands-on activities. This means you often excel in environments where theories and models are presented for understanding.

Your learning process typically involves watching and thinking. You take in information through reflection and then conceptualize it into coherent frameworks. This methodical approach allows you to organize ideas effectively and see how different pieces fit together. Because of this, you might find yourself drawn to subjects like mathematics, sciences, or philosophy, where abstract reasoning is key.

In group settings, you might prefer to observe and listen before contributing your thoughts. You value precision and clarity, so you take time to ensure your ideas are well-formed. When faced with new information, you often seek out thorough resources and detailed explanations to fully grasp the concepts.

Converging Learning Style

Learners with a Converging learning style excel at applying ideas to practical, real-world situations. You’re likely to be a problem-solver who enjoys finding solutions and using theories to address specific challenges. This style combines abstract conceptualization and active experimentation, meaning you prefer to think through ideas and then put them into practice.

You might find that technical tasks and hands-on projects are more engaging than discussions or group activities. This doesn’t mean you dislike people; it just means you thrive when you can focus on practical applications rather than interpersonal dynamics. You enjoy working with tools, technology, and methodologies that allow you to see immediate results.

In a classroom or work setting, you’re the person who loves to immerse into projects, experiments, and simulations. You prefer clear objectives and direct paths to reach solutions. This makes you efficient in fields like engineering, IT, and other technical disciplines.

Your strength lies in your ability to take theoretical knowledge and turn it into concrete results, which is a valuable skill in many professional environments. Understanding and leveraging your Converging learning style can help you maximize your potential and achieve your goals effectively.

Accommodating Learning Style

An accommodating learning style thrives on hands-on experiences and intuitive, adaptive approaches to learning. If you identify with this style, you likely enjoy learning by doing and are comfortable taking risks in new situations. You’re driven by gut feelings rather than purely logical analysis, which means you often excel when you can adapt to changing circumstances quickly.

You prefer group work and interactive activities where you can collaborate with others. This social aspect helps you learn more effectively, as you can bounce ideas off your peers and adapt based on feedback. Practical tasks, like experiments or role-playing, are particularly engaging for you.

In situations that require immediate action or quick thinking, you tend to do well because of your flexible nature. You might find traditional lecture-based learning less engaging, as it doesn’t provide the active involvement you thrive on. Instead, fieldwork, internships, and projects where you can immerse yourself in real-world scenarios will likely suit you better.

Recognizing that your strength lies in adaptability and action can help you seek out learning experiences that play to these strengths, leading to more effective and enjoyable learning outcomes.

Applying Kolb’s Theory

To effectively apply Kolb’s theory, you’ll need to design learning experiences that align with the different stages of his experiential learning cycle. Start by ensuring learners have a Concrete Experience, which might involve hands-on activities or real-world scenarios. This gives them something tangible to reflect on.

Next, encourage Reflective Observation, where learners think about their experiences. You could prompt them with questions or have them discuss their thoughts in groups. This reflection helps them form deeper understandings.

Following this, guide them into Abstract Conceptualization. Here, they’ll develop new ideas or modify existing ones based on their reflections. You can support this process by providing theoretical models or frameworks that relate to their experiences.

Finally, give learners the chance to use Active Experimentation to apply what they’ve learned to new situations.

Key Support and Criticism of Kolb’s Learning Styles

Kolb’s Learning Styles have garnered significant attention and sparked both support and criticism within the educational and psychological communities. The research has found little evidence to support the idea that learning styles lead to better educational outcomes.

According to the American Psychological Association (APA), the belief in learning styles can actually be detrimental. One study found that some educators mistakenly believe that learning styles are heritable and affect brain function. Such beliefs may contribute to a fixed mindset about learning abilities.

Support

1. Personalized learning: One of the primary strengths of Kolb’s theory is its emphasis on personalized learning. By recognizing that individuals have different preferences for processing information, educators and trainers can tailor their methods to better suit the needs of their learners, potentially enhancing engagement and retention.
2. Holistic approach: Kolb’s model doesn’t just focus on cognitive processes; it also considers experiential learning, which encompasses feelings, perceptions, and behaviors. This holistic approach acknowledges that learning is a multifaceted process that goes beyond mere intellectual activity.
3. Practical applications: The theory has practical applications in various settings, from educational institutions to corporate training programs. By understanding and applying Kolb’s learning styles, teachers, trainers, and managers can create more effective and engaging learning experiences.
4. Self-awareness: Kolb’s model encourages individuals to become more aware of their learning preferences. This self-awareness can lead to more effective learning strategies and a better understanding of how to approach new and challenging material.

Criticism

1. Lack of empirical evidence: One major criticism of Kolb’s learning styles is the lack of robust empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of tailoring education to specific learning styles. Some studies suggest that there is little to no improvement in learning outcomes when instruction is matched to a learner’s preferred style.
2. Over-simplification: Critics argue that Kolb’s model oversimplifies the complexity of human learning. By categorizing learners into four distinct styles, it may ignore the nuanced and dynamic nature of learning processes that can change depending on the context and content.
3. Rigidity: Some educators believe that adhering too strictly to learning styles can be limiting. It might encourage both teachers and learners to focus too narrowly on preferred methods, potentially missing out on the benefits of developing versatility in learning approaches.
4. Potential for misapplication: There is a risk that Kolb’s learning styles can be misapplied or overemphasized, leading to ineffective educational practices. For example, educators might spend excessive time trying to identify and cater to individual styles rather than focusing on content quality and instructional methods that are broadly effective.

While Kolb’s Learning Styles offer valuable insights into personalized learning and have practical applications, it’s essential to approach the theory with a critical eye. Balancing an understanding of individual learning preferences with evidence-based educational practices can lead to more effective and inclusive learning environments.

Summary

By understanding Kolb’s learning styles—Diverging, Assimilating, Converging, and Accommodating—you can discover how you best process information. Recognizing whether you excel at brainstorming, organizing concepts, solving practical problems, or hands-on activities helps you learn more effectively.

Using Kolb’s model, you can align your strengths with specific learning stages: Concrete Experience, Reflective Observation, Abstract Conceptualization, and Active Experimentation. This knowledge empowers you to optimize your learning strategies and allows educators to create personalized learning experiences.

EXPERT PICKS: WHAT TO READ NEXT

• What Is Kinesthetic Learning? Do you tend to learn best by doing? Then you might just be a kinesthetic, or tactile learner.
• What Is Latent Learning? Not everything we learned is utilized right away. Latent learning refers to the things we learn that are not immediately put to use or displayed.
• Exploring Social Learning Theory: Sometimes, we learn best from other people. Discover more about how we learn by observation.

Sources:

American Psychological Association. (2019). Belief in learning styles myth may be detrimental. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2019/05/learning-styles-myth

Nancekivell, S. E., Shah, P., & Gelman, S. A. (2020). Maybe they’re born with it, or maybe it’s experience: Toward a deeper understanding of the learning style myth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000366 doi:10.1037/edu0000366

Taheri, M., Falahchai, M., Javanak, M., Hemmati, Y. B., & Bozorgi, M. D. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between learning styles (Kolb and VARK) and creativity with the academic achievement of dental students. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10, 252. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1492_20